Western South Dakota's Only Ranch Station

Another move to mandate RFID ear tags gets push back

WASHINGTON, DC –  Industry organizations and producers are calling a recent announcement by the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS)  another end-run attempt to madate the use of Radio Frequency Identification (RFID) ear tags.

USDA is seeking public comment on a proposal where APHIS would only approve Radio Frequency Identification (RFID) as the official ear tag for use in interstate movement of cattle that are required to be identified by the traceability regulations.

R-CALF USA responded to the announcement saying that, “USDA’s actions contradict current law that expressly allows cattle producers to choose among various identification devices, including metal ear tags, as well as backtags, brands, tattoos, and group lot identification.”

USDA says that a transition to RFID tags would support ongoing efforts to increase animal disease traceability by more accurately and rapidly allowing animal health officials to know where affected and at-risk animals are located. While this would not prevent disease outbreaks, the agency says it would allow animal health officials to more quickly contain outbreaks early before they can do substantial damage to the U.S. cattle industry.

APHIS is also seeking comment on a proposed timeline for implementation, which the agency would use if this transition occurs.  The timeline would make RFID tags the only option for use in cattle and bison requiring official identification on January 1, 2023. APHIS would “grandfather in” animals that have metal tags already in place on that date – their metal tags would serve as official identification for the remainder of their lifespan.

During the transition timeline, existing regulations that allows for animal health officials in shipping and receiving states to agree to accept alternate forms of identification, including brands and tattoos, would still be in force.

R-CALF Animal Identification Committee Chair Kenny Fox, Belvidere, SD,  said “This is yet another end-run around the 2013 regulation that allows producers to use a variety of identification and traceability techniques,” Fox said. He also pointed out that an agency policy such as this cannot trump existing regulations and the USDA appears to be on a fishing expedition to force the cattle industry to expend unnecessary resources to fight a proposal that the agency has no authority to implement.

In October 2019, R-CALF USA represented by Harriet Hageman of the New Civil Liberties Alliance, filed a lawsuit that successfully blocked the USDA’s first attempt to unlawfully mandate the exclusive use of RFID eartags.

“The agency is completely out of touch with the needs of America’s cattle producers who are experiencing perhaps the worst economic cost-price squeeze in history, which has been greatly exacerbated by the COVID-19 Pandemic,” Fox commented.

Public comments on the proposal will be accepted through October 5, 2020 online, here

People are also reading...

The final Public Lands rule drew criticism from congressional and industry leaders.

Weather

loader-image
Rapid City, US
12:59 am, April 25, 2024
temperature icon 51°F
clear sky
Humidity 59 %
Pressure 1010 mb
Wind 9 mph
Wind Gust: 12 mph
Visibility: 0 km
Sunrise: 5:52 am
Sunset: 7:48 pm
Abigail Tweedy

Market News

Share via
Copy link